Novel idea: Let’s shrink government

by

Congressman Jason Chaffetz ran on a platform that included fiscal discipline, limited government and Jason Chaffetzaccountability. He has been back in DC making his mark by thinking outside the box and pushing forward new ideas. The newly formed “Sunset Caucus” is a prime example. Officially listed as a co-sponsor, it is clear to anyone who has been around Chaffetz very long that this group is his baby.  Shrinking government by getting rid of obsolete programs that are no longer necessary?  Shine the light of accountability into corners that haven’t been looked at for years?   Lead out on a new way of doing things and get others to follow?  Quintessential Jason Chaffetz.

The caucus has over 40 members dedicated to disproving Ronald Reagan’s statement: “No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on this earth.”  Each member of the caucus has committed to taking at least one federal program that has outlived its usefulness and work towards unfunding it and getting it off the books.

Congressman Chaffetz is starting with three programs: One is a $28 million annual subsidy for mohair, the fabric made from yarn made from Angora goats. Mohair subsidies were originally authorized to hold down the cost of military uniforms, but the military has not used mohair in uniforms since the Korean War.

Then, there is the $30 million spent annually on the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund, established in 1963 to help states and local governments acquire new land and make improvements in their parks – not an appropriate role for the federal government.

Finally, Chaffetz will also lead the fight to eliminate $14 million in annual funding for the International Fund for Ireland, established in 1986 by the British and Irish governments to encourage reconciliation between nationalists and unionists throughout Ireland – good cause, but not the role of the US government.

I personally am hopeful that the caucus can also work on preventing new wasteful spending from being authorized – like the $400,000+ the NIH wants to spend to find out why men don’t like to wear condoms.

And speaking of fiscal discipline, first quarter spending reports are out and show Chaffetz office spending well under the amount allotted for expenses. Even after the expenses of setting up 2 new offices, with all new staff, he is on track to return well into 6 figures out of $1.4 million.  He spent some $40K less than his predecessor for the first quarter of last year. Congressman Rob Bishop is close behind Chaffetz and is expected to return hundreds of thousands of dollars to the federal government. Congressman Matheson spent the most of the Utah delegation but is still expected to have a surplus.

4 Responses to “Novel idea: Let’s shrink government”

  1. jasonthe Says:

    The idea of “shrinking government” just for the sake of saying “hey, we shrunk government” is about as intelligent as expanding government just to see it get bigger.

    Thankfully not many are taking Chaffetz seriously on the hill. I believe the process of governance is a bit more nuanced and complex than lil’ Jason’s black and white talking points and over-simplified “solutions” based more on an ideology Americans have rejected than a sound plan for taking our country in the right direction.

    I’m tired of congresspeople drafting/supporting actual legislation with just as little substance in their rhetoric as you’d expect to see during their campaign.

  2. lynntaylor Says:

    Hey! “Jasonthe” is back! I love that screen name… it lets me fill in all sorts of adjectives; and every time he(?) posts, I think of new ones. Such a fount of creativity.

    My other favorite thing about Jt’s posts is deconstructing them…
    1st paragraph: Yup, you’re exactly right! Fortunately that isn’t what the Sunset Caucus is all about. But you knew that already, right?

    2nd paragraph: Wow… that whole paragraph is about as objective and accurate as your typical Keith Olbermann statement (which will undoubtedly be taken as a compliment). Far be it from me to correct the perception, though. It’ll just make it that much more entertaining later.

    3rd paragraph: Well, shucks, we agree again! You excellently articulated why I’m SO hoping that the Harry Reids and Nancy Pelosis of Congress continue to flail about, throwing every piece of legislation they can think of at the wall in the hope that something sticks, as unemployment continues to rise and businesses continue to crumble. I’d be more optimistic that people would catch on to the ineptitude if there was some actual coverage of the congressional buffoonery since 2006. In the end, though, I guess it will still all be Bush’s fault in 2012.

    I still “hope” to see some of that “change” we were promised. Like more openness and transparency in the legislative process. So far all I’ve seen is moves in the opposite direction. Still, we do have OUR HERO to save us: http://sendables.jibjab.com/originals/hes_barack_obama

    Thanks for the chuckle, Jt! I just hope that when it’s all over, I still have some change left.

  3. Rick Says:

    The more I learn about Jason Chaffetz the more there is to like about him. It is a great idea to go through expenditures and shut down obsolete programs. It may not sound like much but it is a start. With early successes it could snowball.

  4. Utah's Arch Says:

    Chaffetz is Providing the Leadership Promised…

    Shortly after the election where Jason Chaffetz won the Third District Seat in Congress, I found myself in a debate with some neighbors about congressional tenure and it’s value in voting for a candidate.  This discussion was primarily centered a…

Comments are closed.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,860 other followers