On Thursday, the monthly Utah County GOP executive committee meeting was held in Orem. Things started off smoothly with an announcement of calendar items, the treasurer’s report, secretary’s report, and tech committee report.
In case you’re a junkie like me, the calendar includes:
Aug 20 – next executive committee meeting
Aug 27 – central committee meeting and legislative district leadership elections
Aug 29 – Utah county GOP summer barbecue (likely to have a fee)
Sept 9 – training meeting for all legislative district officers
Oct 10 – additional central committee meeting to address bylaw changes
After some additional reports by the secretary, the treasurer, the fundraising committee and the tech committee, the meeting moved to proposed bylaw changes. All proposed bylaws were tabled – one at a time – until the August meeting. New chair Taylor Oldroyd allowed anyone who wanted to speak the opportunity to do so and there were several comments from members of the public.
Vice-chair Mark Cluff pointed out that he did not believe the county was “required” to have a filing deadline for the legislative leadership elections. After a somewhat spirited discussion, it was decided that no one needs to file to run for leadership positions in their legislative district. All filing deadlines were canceled and people can and will be nominated from the floor on August 27. It seems that decision favors those who choose not to campaign openly and disadvantages those who do. How is it “open” to not even require candidates to declare? Hmm…
The argument in favoring of removing the deadline – a deadline voted on and approved by members of the executive committee in June, by the way – was this: because the bylaws do not specifically state that there MUST be a deadline, it was therefore a defacto statement that there COULD NOT be a deadline. It was felt that precedent from the last several election cycles was not reason enough to have a deadline and it was removed.
The only member of the steering committee to speak in opposition to this proposal was Lisa Shepherd, county party secretary. There were several other members of the executive committee who were in opposition but since the decision was made to remove the deadline without a vote, there is no way to accurately report whether the majority took this position, or simply those who talked loudly and vociferously.
From that discussion, two other proposed bylaws were quickly tabled – one to codify the deadline for delegate replacement and one to bring platform changes to the conventions for ratification on an individual basis.
Then, the discussion went to the idea of the county party providing a “delegate information pamphlet” on the pros and cons of various resolutions, by-law changes, platform changes and party constitution changes. Great idea, right? Help the delegates understand both sides? Apparently it’s not that simple. Who would write the “pro” argument”? Who would write the “con”? What if there was no con? (No one said this, but I had to wonder – what if there is no pro?!) Over and over I heard members of the executive committee say the committee should be the ones controlling the message. They decided they would “probably” ask the person who brought forward the proposed change to write the “pro” (which does seem fair and reasonable), but that they (the exec committee) would choose the person to write the con from among their committee. Of course, they would have final say on all “positions”. The reasoning was that you can’t have “just anyone” write an information piece and publish it. What if they lied? What if they swore? No, no – that would never do….the committee must control it.
I ask – what is so scary about a differing opinion? Surely there are ways to ensure that a profanity-laden piece of snark not become the “position paper” without resorting to “overseeing” and controlling a position on a proposal that disagrees with their own. Come on people – you are smart. I know you can figure this out.
Good thing bloggers are out there keeping things real, keeping things open and keeping them transparent. If you live in Utah county, I encourage you to come to these meetings. I venture you will find them quite enlightening.